In an era where counterfeiting and piracy are skyrocketing, businesses are grappling with the challenge of protecting their brands. In 2022, the global value of these illicit activities was a staggering $28 trillion. Every year, counterfeiters are becoming more innovative, constantly finding ways to evade anti-counterfeit and anti-piracy measures. For many businesses, the legal route offers a reliable solution. In the United States, pursuing counterfeiters often involves civil litigation. This process can not only provide relief, but it can also act as a deterrent against future counterfeiting. Understanding civil litigation and how it can be leveraged is crucial for businesses aiming to safeguard their brands. To discuss this subject in more detail alongside a qualified Chicago intellectual property lawyer, call (929)724-7529 today to book a consultation with Sullivan & Carter, LLP.
Under United States law, counterfeiting is considered a severe crime. It's strictly penalized under both criminal and civil law. Courts are empowered to seize counterfeit goods, order monetary damages, and in some instances, even imprison violators.
At the heart of the battle against counterfeiting, the primary regulatory force is the Lanham Act. This act provides brand owners the right to seek damages from individuals or entities that have infringed upon their trademarks intentionally. Under the Lanham Act, one can file a civil lawsuit against counterfeiters. In civil litigation, brand owners have the opportunity to recover actual damages, profits made by the violator, and attorneys' fees. They can also request the court to issue an injunction, preventing future counterfeiting and sale of counterfeit goods. It gives power to law-exemplifying entities to seize counterfeit products as evidence, which in effect, hampers the counterfeiter's income.
In addition, the United States also follows strict import regulations through the Tariff Act of 1930. This act, enforced by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), makes importing counterfeit products into the US illegal. It empowers the CBP to detain, seize, and destroy items identified as counterfeit.
Moreover, the Stop Counterfeiting in Manufactured Goods Act, another vital piece of legislation, further provides protection against counterfeiters. This law makes it illegal to knowingly use a counterfeit mark on or in relation to goods, and further prohibits trafficking counterfeit labels, patches, stickers, wrappers, badges, emblems, or similar items.
As with any legal proceeding, civil litigation for counterfeiting comes with its fair share of obstacles. While the United States law poses heavy punishments for counterfeiting, taking advantage of the legal frameworks can be rather taxing. The challenges, sadly, often overshadow the potential benefits of a court case. Evidence collection stands as a significant hurdle in counterfeit lawsuits. A successful counterfeiting case hinges on the quality and quantity of evidence presented. Collecting concrete proofs of counterfeiting can often become a daunting task as counterfeiters are adept at concealing their activities.
In many cases, businesses also grapple with the anonymity of counterfeiters. The surge in online counterfeiting activities has given rogue traders the cloak of invisibility. E-commerce platforms and online marketplaces offer pseudonyms and fake credentials, making it difficult to identify and pin down the culprits. Furthermore, the question of jurisdiction often complicates lawsuits. With counterfeiting a global problem, identifying the appropriate court to hear the case can prove to be tricky. The rules governing jurisdiction can vary from one nation to another, or even one state to another, causing additional stresses for businesses. International considerations further complicate these cases, as different countries may have varied definitions and penalties for counterfeiting, hampering efforts to standardize enforcement.
Addressing counterfeiting through civil enforcement involves alternative approaches beyond just punitive measures. It includes both proactive defense strategies and reactive methods designed to staunch the flood of forged goods.
In tandem with these acts previously mentioned, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) undertakes a critical role. If the CBP identifies goods as counterfeit, those goods are seized and forfeited. A civil monetary penalty against the importer might follow suit. Alongside this, the CBP executes exclusion orders dispensed by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The ITC is a quasi-judicial federal body, forming part of the government's bulwark against the illegal import of counterfeit merchandise.
Hiring an attorney for civil litigation related to counterfeiting can be an important consideration for several reasons:
Overall, hiring an attorney for civil litigation related to counterfeiting can provide invaluable support and expertise to protect your intellectual property rights, pursue legal remedies, and achieve a successful resolution of your case.
Navigating civil litigation for counterfeiting may be easier after joining forces with a qualified intellectual property lawyer in Chicago. Call (929) 724-7529 to discuss this subject further alongside Sullivan & Carter, LLP.
Add your email below to receive the latest news, tips, and information from Sullivan & Carter, LLP.
Add your email below to receive the latest news, tips, and information from Sullivan & Carter, LLP.